Verdict

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs Gemini 4: The October 2026 AI Ranking

Our verdict: Claude Opus 5.5 is the best AI model you can use right now. It's #1 on the leading independent intelligence index, leads the hardest public coding test and costs 40% of GPT-6 Astra's price. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the best value, and Gemini 4 Argon ties Astra for a fraction of the price.

September was the most crowded month in AI this year. OpenAI shipped GPT-6 Astra on the 3rd, then Sol and Luna on the 22nd, the same day Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5. Google answered with Gemini 4 Argon on October 13, and the rankings changed.

Two glowing crystal spheres, one amber and one blue, connected by arcs of electricity on a dark reflective floor
A heavyweight fight: Anthropic, OpenAI and Google launched competing flagships within weeks of each other. Illustration: TechVerdict.
Compared Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 GPT-6 Astra Gemini 4 Argon GPT-6 Sol Claude Fable 5.1 Gemini 3.8 Flash

The intelligence leaderboard

Infographic leaderboard of the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Claude Opus 5.5 58, Claude Sonnet 5.5 56, GPT-6 Astra 53, Gemini 4 Argon 53, Claude Fable 5.1 53, GPT-6.1 Sol 52, Gemini 3.8 Flash 41
The scores: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, each model at its top setting, checked October 15, 2026. Infographic: TechVerdict.

Labs publish benchmark tables that rarely overlap. Only seven tests appear in both Anthropic's and OpenAI's launch materials; Opus 5.5 leads four, Astra leads two, and one isn't comparable. So we weight the independent Artificial Analysis index most and treat vendor numbers as directional.

The 6 models at a glance

Claude Opus 5.5
Best overall
$4 / $20 per 1M tokens in / out
  • Index score 58, #1
  • 89.9% on SWE-bench Pro
  • Best for agentic coding and hard engineering

The catch: max effort burns tokens.

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Best value
$2 / $10 per 1M tokens in / out
  • Index score 56, #2
  • 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, ahead of Opus
  • Best for everyday production work

The catch: trails Opus on the hardest jobs.

GPT-6 Astra
The specialist
$10 / $50 per 1M tokens; $20 / $75 past 272K
  • Index score 53
  • Strong at science-heavy reasoning
  • Best for computer-use automation

The catch: the most expensive option here.

Gemini 4 Argon
Best Google model
$2 / $10 per 1M tokens to Nov 30, then $4 / $20
  • Index score 53, tied with Astra
  • 1M tokens of input and output combined
  • Best for Google Cloud and Workspace teams

The catch: the low price ends November 30.

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI workhorse
$2 / $10 per 1M tokens; $4 / $15 past 272K
  • Index score 52 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
  • Roughly half GPT-5.6 prices
  • Best for teams already on OpenAI

The catch: behind Sonnet 5.5 at the same price.

Claude Fable 5.1
The writer
$10 / $50 per 1M tokens in / out
  • Index score 53
  • 81.2% on SWE-bench Pro
  • Best for brand voice and long-form drafts

The catch: Opus 5.5 beats it for less.

The scoreboard

Prices checked October 15, 2026, on each company's own pricing page.

ModelReleasedPrice per 1M tokens (in / out)ContextAA Intelligence IndexSWE-bench Pro
Claude Opus 5.5Sep 22$4 / $201M, no surcharge58 (#1)89.9%
GPT-6 AstraSep 3$10 / $50 ($20 / $75 over 272K)Surcharge past 272K53–
Gemini 4 ArgonOct 13$2 / $10 (intro), $4 / $20 from Dec 11M input + output combined53–
Claude Fable 5.1Summer$10 / $50–5381.2%
Claude Sonnet 5.5Sep 28$2 / $101M, no surcharge56–
GPT-6 Sol / 6.1 SolSep 22$2 / $10$4 / $15 past 272K52 (6.1 Sol)–
Gemini 3.8 FlashSep 2$0.75 / $3.75 (through Dec 31)–41–

What each one can do

FeatureOpus 5.5Sonnet 5.5AstraArgonSolFable 5.1
1M-token context✓✓–✓––
Vision (reads images and charts)✓✓–✓–✓
Cheapest tier ($2 / $10)✗✓✗To Nov 30✓✗
Agent and computer use✓✓✓✓–✓

– means the company hasn't said on its launch page.

What the price gap means in dollars

Take a busy internal coding assistant: 50 million input tokens and 10 million output tokens a month.

ModelMonthly bill
Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6 Sol$200
Gemini 4 Argon$200 through November 30, then $400
Claude Opus 5.5$400
GPT-6 Astra$1,000, more if a request passes 272K tokens

Astra has to be much better at your task to justify 2.5 times the bill. For most coding and knowledge work, it isn't.

Claude Opus 5.5: the new default

Opus 5.5 is built for long, multi-step work: agentic coding, research and tasks that run for hours. Its 89.9% on SWE-bench Pro is well ahead of Fable 5.1 (81.2%), and it holds a 1M-token window with no long-prompt penalty.

The catch: at maximum effort it thinks for a long time. Independent testers have seen a single hard agentic task cost around $13.

Claude Opus 5.5 launch artwork with the model name over a horizon at sunrise
Claude Opus 5.5: released September 22, at $4/$20 per million tokens. Image: Anthropic.
Save money on Opus: run it at default effort and switch to max effort only for problems it can't solve on the first pass. Most of that $13 bill comes from max-effort thinking.

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Opus-level work for half the price

For most teams, Sonnet 5.5 (September 28) is the more important launch. It scores 56 on the index and beats Opus 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (70.6% vs 66.4%). On the GDPval-AA office-work test it lands at 1,844 Elo, two points behind Opus and far ahead of GPT-6 Sol's 1,487.

Opus still leads FrontierCode (54.4% vs 52.1%). The practical setup: Sonnet as the default, Opus for problems Sonnet can't crack.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 launch artwork with the model name above Earth seen from a spacecraft window
Claude Sonnet 5.5: the same price as GPT-6 Sol, closer to Opus. Image: Anthropic.

GPT-6 Astra: still the specialist

Astra aims at coding, research, computer use and multi-step professional work. It still leads on science-heavy reasoning and on automating software through a screen.

But at $10/$50, with the whole request repriced to $20/$75 once input passes 272,000 tokens, it's the costliest route to frontier quality. That surcharge rules it out for long documents.

GPT-6 Astra launch artwork showing a spiral of stars shaped like the number 6
GPT-6 Astra: launched September 3. Image: OpenAI.

Gemini 4 Argon: Google's comeback bid

Argon scores 53 on the index, level with Astra and five points behind Opus 5.5. Google says it ranks #1 on the Vals Index, but it hasn't published SWE-bench Pro scores that line up with the other labs' tables.

The price is the story. It's $2/$10 through November 30, then $4/$20. There's no free API tier; in the Gemini app it comes with Google AI Pro ($19.99 a month) and Ultra. See our Gemini 4 explainer.

Gemini 4 Argon launch artwork with the model name beside a large glowing number 4 on a blue background
Gemini 4 Argon: released October 13. Image: Google.

GPT-6 Sol: OpenAI's everyday pick

Sol matters more to most OpenAI customers than Astra does. At $2/$10 it roughly halves GPT-5.6 costs, so if you're still on GPT-5.6, switch. GPT-6.1 Sol keeps the price, adds cheaper cached input and scores 52 on the index.

What about Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Fable 5.1 is still a beautiful writer, worth keeping for brand voice and long-form drafting, but Opus 5.5 matches or beats it at 40% of the price. Gemini 3.8 Flash is Google's fast, cheap model, covered in our cheapest AI model verdict alongside Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna at $0.10/$0.50.

Which model should you use?

Agentic coding and hard engineering
Claude Opus 5.5
Everyday code, documents and spreadsheets
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Science research or computer-use automation
GPT-6 Astra (under 272K)
Your team runs on Google Cloud or Workspace
Gemini 4 Argon
You're already built on OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
$
High-volume tagging, extraction and chat
Claude Haiku 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna

Data that can't leave your servers? See our non-cloud LLM guide.

The verdict

Claude Opus 5.5 is the best AI model right now, with the top independent score, the top coding score and a price 60% below GPT-6 Astra's. Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 for everyday work, test Gemini 4 Argon while it's $2/$10, and pay for Astra only for science and automation.

FAQ

What is the best AI model in October 2026?

Claude Opus 5.5. Artificial Analysis ranks it #1 on its Intelligence Index with a score of 58, five points ahead of GPT-6 Astra, Claude Fable 5.1 and Google's new Gemini 4 Argon, and it leads SWE-bench Pro at 89.9%. GPT-6 Astra still wins some science and automation tasks.

How much does Claude Opus 5.5 cost?

$4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, with a 1M-token context window and no long-context surcharge. That's 40% of GPT-6 Astra's $10/$50 list price.

Is GPT-6 Astra worth the higher price?

For most teams, no. Astra costs $10/$50 per million tokens and $20/$75 once a request passes 272,000 input tokens. It's worth testing for science-heavy research and computer-use automation, but Opus 5.5 is cheaper and ahead on most shared benchmarks.

What happened to Claude Fable 5?

It was updated to Fable 5.1, which scores 81.2% on SWE-bench Pro and 53 on the Artificial Analysis index. Claude Opus 5.5 now matches or beats it on most tasks at a lower price, so most teams should default to Opus 5.5.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Opus 5.5?

For most everyday work it's nearly as good for half the price. Sonnet 5.5, released September 28, 2026 at $2/$10 per million tokens, beats Opus 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (70.6% vs 66.4%) and nearly ties it on office-work tests. Opus 5.5 still leads on the hardest coding and on the overall intelligence index.

What is GPT-6 Sol?

OpenAI's lower-cost GPT-6 model, released September 22 at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. A point update, GPT-6.1 Sol, is now on OpenAI's price list at the same rate with cheaper cached input. Independent tests place both behind Opus 5.5.

Where does Gemini 4 Argon rank?

Google released Gemini 4 Argon on October 13, 2026. It scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, tied with GPT-6 Astra and five points behind Claude Opus 5.5. It costs $2/$10 per million tokens through November 30, 2026, then $4/$20, the same as Opus 5.5.